Henry Westmann

This guide covers three key aspects of working with Flux Krea: prompt engineering, generation settings, and LoRA usage.Prompt EngineeringFlux Krea performs on par with Flux Dev, and in many cases, it can be argued that they are essentially the same model with slight but meaningful improvements. These improvements significantly reduce the common “Flux face” issue and enhance overall aesthetics. When used correctly, Flux Krea can achieve realism comparable to MidJourney and Ideogram.Generation SettingsWhen it comes to generation settings, less is often more. Excellent results can be achieved with as few as 15–17 steps. For optimal quality, set CFG to 1 and Guidance to 4.5. Use parameters like Euler and Normal (or Simple) for consistently high-quality outputs.Optimal configuration:Steps: 15–17 (high quality with minimal computation time)CFG: 1 (ensures creative flexibility without overfitting)Guidance: 4.5 (balanced adherence to prompt)Sampler: Euler or Normal/Simple for consistent, natural renderingTip: Keep adjustments minimal—small tweaks can significantly alter output quality.LoRA UsageFlux Krea interacts seamlessly with LoRAs, particularly Flux Dev LoRAs or any LoRA, when set between 0.8 and 0.7. Keeping LoRA strength lower ensures better balance and integration with your prompts. When combined with the recommended generation settings, this approach consistently delivers exceptional images.Best practice:Strength: 0.8–0.7 for optimal blending with the base modelApproach: Pair LoRA integration with the recommended generation settings for best results. Lower strengths preserve the model’s natural style while enhancing specific visual elements.

This model is unrivaled when it comes to creating the most dazzling sparkling effects available on the market. But it doesn't just stop there; it transcends typical functionality by bringing these effects to life in a way that's truly mesmerizing. Each spark and shimmer is crafted with precision to not only catch the eye but also to evoke a sense of wonder and magic. Whether it's for professional stage lighting, high-end photography, or festive decorations, this model ensures that every sparkle is vivid, dynamic, and utterly lifelike. it allows for customization that breathes personality into every generationcheck my profile for the “Sparkling Dust Lora Flux”

Since the release of Flux, the model has undergone constant updates and gained a variety of fine-tuned versions from the community. Through experimentation, I’ve discovered that Flux is remarkably forgiving when training LoRAs, making it an excellent choice for creators. However, despite its strengths, Flux does have some notable limitations.One of the key advantages of Flux is its exceptional performance in realism. It surpasses many models, including most SD models, in areas like anatomy and overall quality. However, it tends to struggle with illustrations. After training multiple LoRAs, I noticed that Flux has difficulty rendering elements like wet or reflective skin and similar complex textures. These limitations suggest that while Flux shines in specific areas, it may not be the best option for all creative needs.This is where models like “SD3.5M & L” come into play. Although Flux is superior to most SD models in terms of realism and anatomical capabilities, SD3.5M & L excels in specific areas where Flux falters. For instance, SD3.5M handles reflective surfaces, wet skin, and intricate textural details with remarkable accuracy. This makes it a valuable alternative, particularly for creators focused on illustrations or scenarios requiring high levels of visual complexity.I encourage everyone to explore the SD3.5M model and other SD3.5 models and finetunes. While Flux dominates in many aspects , SD3.5M may offer unexplored advantages that can complement or even surpass Flux in certain applications. Broadening your experimentation with these models could reveal new possibilities and insights for creative workflows.